Analysis: What Is the Senate's 'Nuclear Option'? - NBC New York
National & International News
The day’s top national and international news

Analysis: What Is the Senate's 'Nuclear Option'?

The Senate voted to "go nuclear" Thursday, eliminating the filibuster for Neil Gorsuch and future Supreme Court picks

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    Meet Four Inspiring Kids Tackling Cancer
    AP, File
    In this Dec. 12, 2016 file photo, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. McConnell invoked the "nuclear option" to confirm President Donald Trump's Supreme Court pick, Neil Gorsuch.

    The Senate has voted to "go nuclear" and eliminate the filibuster for President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee and future court picks. The move came Thursday afternoon after Democrats blocked the nomination of Neil Gorsuch.

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell raised a point of order to change the rules "under the precedent set on Nov. 21, 2013," when Senate Democrats who were then in the majority made the same move for lower court and executive branch nominations.

    Such action has been called "the nuclear option" because of its probable impact on Senate traditions of bipartisanship.

    WHAT IS THE NUCLEAR OPTION?
    Under that option, nominations could be approved with a simple majority in the 100-member Senate. It currently takes more than that, 60 votes, to clear parliamentary hurdles and set up an up-or-down vote on the nominee.

    Trump Accuser: 'We Are Not Holding Our President Accountable'

    [NATL] Trump Accuser: 'We Are Not Holding Our President Accountable'

    Jessica Leeds discusses the fallout of her accusation of sexual misconduct by President Donald Trump.

    (Published 4 hours ago)

    IT'S HAPPENED BEFORE
    This procedural maneuver has recent precedent. In 2013, Democrats were in the majority under the leadership of Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada and upset about the blockage of President Barack Obama's nominees to a powerful appellate court. Democrats pushed through a rules change lowering the vote threshold on all nominees except for the Supreme Court from 60 to a simple majority.

    The Supreme Court was exempted as part of a deal bringing along Democrats reluctant to change the rules.

    At the time, McConnell warned Democrats the strategy would backfire: "I say to my friends on the other side of the aisle, you will regret this, and you may regret it a lot sooner than you think."

    Before 1975, it was even tougher for presidents to get their nominations through because two-thirds of the senators present and voting had to agree to move forward.

    WHY IT WOULD BE EXPLOSIVE
    Such a rules change on Supreme Court nominees would be a momentous change for the Senate, which traditionally operates via bipartisanship and consent from all senators. Some believe it could begin to unravel Senate traditions at a hyper-partisan moment in politics and perhaps end up in the complete elimination of the filibuster even for legislation, which would mean an entirely different Senate from the one that's existed for decades.

    Senate experts note that the filibuster is not enshrined in the Constitution and that filibustering nominees is a relatively recent phenomenon. Cloture — the procedural motion to end a filibuster — was attempted for the first time on a nominee in 1968 after President Lyndon Johnson tapped Abe Fortas as chief justice of the U.S., according to the Congressional Research Service.

    The cloture attempt failed, and the nomination was withdrawn.

    McConnell is an institutionalist who has made clear he does not favor invoking the nuclear option and is doing so grudgingly; he has repeatedly said Gorsuch will be confirmed.