Panetta warns against politicization

View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print

    NEWSLETTERS

    TK
    AP
    The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Leon Panetta, weighs-in against politicization.

    CIA Director Leon Panetta warned Monday against making his agency a pawn in the nation’s partisan political battles, even as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s claim that she was lied to by the CIA continues to reverberate in Washington.

    “If they start to use these issues as political clubs to beat each other up with, that’s when we not only pay a price but this country pays a price,” Panetta said during a question-and-answer session following a lunchtime speech in Los Angeles. “One of the things that I really want to do as director of the CIA is to improve the relationship with the Congress…I realize that we’ve been through a rough period.”

    Rough may be an understatement. Last week, Pelosi accused the CIA of lying to her during a 2002 briefing about interrogation techniques. On Friday, Panetta issued an unusual written statement to agency employees rebutting Pelosi’s claim, and Pelosi later backpedaled, saying it was the Bush administration that misled Congress.

    Panetta didn’t explicitly discuss the flap with Pelosi in his remarks Monday to the Pacific Council on International Policy. However, in response to questions, he stressed his desire to keep Congress abreast of the CIA’s activities.

    “The Intelligence Committee does have a responsibility to oversee our operations and what I intend to do is to make sure they are fully informed of what we’re doing,” he said.

    Panetta said he wants to expand briefings to the full intelligence panels, not just their leaders. He also said he plans to be on Capitol Hill Tuesday morning for coffee with a group of lawmakers.

    Panetta, a former California congressman and chief of staff to President Bill Clinton, said he would cooperate with any “truth commission” Congress might establish to inquire into Bush-era interrogation practices and related activities, but he suggested that another inquiry already underway in the Senate might be adequate to address such issues.

    “I’m not going to tell the Congress or anybody else what they should or should not do with regards to this issue,” Panetta said. “I do believe that it’s important to learn the lessons of that period. I think that the study by the Intelligence Committee in the Senate will give us that opportunity.”

     

    However, the CIA director again warned against making intelligence-related matters a political football.

    “What I’m most concerned about is that this stuff doesn’t become the kind of political issue that everything else becomes in Washington, D.C., where it becomes so divisive that it begins to interfere with the ability of these intelligence agencies to do our primary job which is to focus on the threats that face us today,” he said.

    Some observers said Panetta’s need to defend the agency last week was particularly acute because he has little background in intelligence matters and is regarded warily by some agency employees as a politician.

    During the speech Monday, he was candid about his roots. “I’m a creature of the Congress,” he said at least twice.

    During his West Coast appearance, Panetta also defended the CIA’s program to use unmanned Predator drones to attack Al Qaeda operatives in Pakistan. He said civilian deaths blamed on such missions are more likely the fault of military operations in the region. He also said the drones have played a unique role in undermining the terrorist network.

    “These operations have been very effective because they have been very precise in terms of targeting and it involved a minimum of collateral damage. Sometimes the criticism sweeps into other areas from either plane attacks or attacks from F-16s and others that go into these areas which do involve a tremendous amount of collateral damage,” the CIA director said. “I can assure you that in terms of that particular area it is very precise and it is very limited in terms of collateral damage. Very frankly, it’s the only game in town in terms of confronting and trying to disrupt the Al Qaeda leadership.”

    Panetta said his agency remains focused in large part on Iraq and North Korea. He boasted that his agency has made strides at gathering intelligence about the secretive regime in Pyongyang.

    “North Korea is a tough target to penetrate for intelligence purposes but we’re making good progress,” Panetta said. “The fact is we had good notice about the fact they were going to deploy the Tapeodong missile and knew pretty well within an hour when that that was going to happen.”