Court Sides With NJ Judges in Pension Dispute

Tuesday's 3-2 ruling follows a challenge by a state Superior Court judge in Hudson County

Tuesday, Jul 24, 2012  |  Updated 10:17 AM EDT
View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print
Rock Stars: Then and Now

Getty Images

advertisement
Photos and Videos
More Photos and Videos

New Jersey's Supreme Court says the state's judges don't have to contribute more to their pensions and health benefits.

Tuesday's 3-2 ruling follows a challenge by a state Superior Court judge in Hudson County.

Judge Paul DePascale sued last year, saying a new law requiring increased contributions violates another law that set judges' salaries and said they cannot be reduced.

Attorneys for the state argued that law doesn't apply to other compensation such as pension and health benefits.

Gov. Chris Christie pushed for the legislation and has been critical of judges who have opposed it. He has said he would consider putting the issue before voters in November if the courts didn't rule his way.

Get the latest from NBC 4 New York anytime, anywhere. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Google+. Get our apps here and sign up for email newsletters here. Get breaking news delivered right to your phone -- just text NYBREAKING to 639710. For more info, text HELP. To end, text STOP. Message and data rates may apply.

Get the latest headlines sent to your inbox!
View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print
Leave Comments
What's New
Follow us on Instagram!
We post photos taken by our news... Read more
Follow Us
Sign up to receive news and updates that matter to you.
Send Us Your Story Tips
Check Out