NY Appeals Court Won't Toss Stop-Frisk Rulings Against NYPD

View Comments ()




    A federal appeals court has refused to toss out court rulings finding that New York City carried out its police stop-and-frisk policy in a discriminatory manner.

    The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals announced its ruling Friday.

    Court Blocks Judge's Stop-and-Frisk Ruling

    [NY] Court Blocks Judge's Stop-and-Frisk Ruling
    A federal appeals court on Thursday blocked a judge's order requiring changes to the NYPD's stop-and-frisk program and removed the judge from the case, saying she had violated the code of conduct for judges. Brynn Gingras reports. (Published Friday, Nov. 1, 2013)

    Last month, an appeals panel had suspended the effects of a lower-court ruling.

    The city had argued that the panel's decision to remove federal Judge Shira Scheindlin meant it should also nullify her rulings.

    Judge Rules NYPD Stop-and-Frisk Violates Rights, Appoints Monitor

    [NY] Judge Rules NYPD Stop-and-Frisk Violates Rights, Appoints Monitor
    A federal judge ruled that the contentious NYPD tactic known as stop-and-frisk violates constitutional rights, appointing a monitor to oversee reforms and ordering the department to test body cameras for officers. Ida Siegal reports. (Published Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2013)

    Scheindlin ruled in August that police officers sometimes carried out stop-and-frisk unconstitutionally by discriminating against minorities.

    The court's action would appear to spoil the city's bid to get Scheindlin's rulings tossed before a new mayor sympathetic to her viewpoint takes office in January.

    Get the latest from NBC 4 New York anywhere, anytime