NBC New York /

News

MTA Bailout Plan Includes East River Tolls

Updated 8:12 PM EDT, Thu, Dec 4, 2008

 

Drivers would pay to cross the East River and New York City-area companies would be taxed on their payrolls under a new plan to staunch financial bleeding at the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

Officials Struggle to Plug MTA Budget Gap

Watch Video

Richard Ravitch, chairman of a state commission examining MTA finances, says fare payers will have to pay their fair share.

But transit riders would be spared a potential 23 percent fare increase. A state commission's proposal, released Thursday, calls for boosting MTA fare revenue by 8 percent instead.

The MTA needs to close an estimated $1.4 billion deficit in its operating budget next year and a $3 billion deficit by 2012. The agency is legally required to balance its budget.

Under the state commission's plan, companies in a 12-county area would pay $330 in tax for every $100,000 they pay workers.

Richard Ravitch, chairman of a state commission examining the transit agency's finances, along with Gov. David Paterson and Mayor Michael Bloomberg, unveiled the plan Thursday.

 It's unclear what the tax-rate might be on NYC companies or whether it would apply statewide.

The Commission on Metropolitan Transportation Authority Financing also called for cutting administrative costs and "some combining of services," Paterson said, without giving details. The MTA has proposed cutting 2,700 jobs and eliminating bus and subway lines that overlap with other lines or have relatively few riders.

"We are in a very difficult fiscal time, and so it's either going to be fare hikes, or it's going to be tolls and a combination of payroll taxes," Gov. David Paterson said at a news conference Wednesday. The MTA did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.

The MTA is required by law to balance its budget, which includes $1.5 billion a year in payments on $27 billion borrowed to rebuild the long-neglected transit system.

Most fares went up in March, as did rates on the agency's commuter railroads and tolls on many of its bridges and tunnels.

The riders' advocacy group Straphangers Campaign could accept another small fare increase if it were coupled with a payroll tax or other new, ongoing source of transit money, group spokesman Gene Russianoff said.

But Greater New York Chamber of Commerce President Mark S. Jaffe said neither businesses nor commuters could afford to pay more for mass transit.

"Right now, people are suffering," said Jaffe, whose group has about 2,000 members.

A payroll tax for transit would require approval from the state Legislature, where the concept is getting a mixed reaction.

Democratic State Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver has said he's open to raising taxes or creating a new tax to support the MTA. But a spokeswoman for Senate Democrats said in a statement Wednesday that "now is not the time to raise taxes."

Republican State Sen. John Flanagan, a member of a board that reviews the MTA's capital spending, said a payroll tax would be ill-timed.

Silver, Smith and Paterson are from New York City, and Flanagan from Long Island.

The MTA's transit system carries more than 8.2 million riders on an average weekday. More than 300 million vehicles a year use its bridges and tunnels.

Copyright Associated Press

Comments (7)

Sort by: Most Recent | Oldest
  • jerry Friday, Dec 5 at 1:30 AM FLAG COMMENT We need to fund mass transit like we do highways. There is no reason why environmentally friendly, congenstion-reducing mass transit systems should be required to collect enough revenues to cover their expenses. Highways never collect a dime. They are built entirely on the taxpayer's expense. The MTA rate hikes, new tolls, and service cuts amount to unfair taxes on the people of Brooklyn and Queens.
  • Frostie Thursday, Dec 4 at 10:39 PM FLAG COMMENT The MTA is wasteful and deceitful - why doesnt Bloomberg give the MTA some money - he has more than enough and we hardly can afford the bus now as it is. Shame on them !
  • tpacicca Thursday, Dec 4 at 7:39 PM FLAG COMMENT why dont they cut bck on there benifits cut back on there big fat pay check/ it was just this last spring that a surplus was undercoved.
  • jerry s Thursday, Dec 4 at 5:49 PM FLAG COMMENT why don,t the MTA get rid of some of the upper management tha sits around doing nothing. They could also save money by cutting jobs In the yards where Train operators are paid to play pool and watch TV They also have some of the female Train Operators offering oral sex to the men
  • MJ Thursday, Dec 4 at 4:14 PM FLAG COMMENT What a sham!! The MTA is a crooked, self-servicing, corrupt agency. I'd rather walk than give more money to these shameless pigs.

Post a Comment

Name


Comment - You have 2000 characters left

Enter both words below, separated by a space, in the field located to the lower right. Can't read the words below? Try different words or an audio captcha. What's this?