Closing Arguments in Conn. Home Invasion Trial

By JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN
|  Friday, Nov 5, 2010  |  Updated 10:27 AM EDT
View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print
Closing Arguments in Conn. Home Invasion Trial

NBCConnecticut

The face of evil: Steven Hayes

A prosecutor says the case of Connecticut man convicted of killing a mother and two daughters in a home invasion cries out for the death penalty.

In his closing argument Thursday, prosecutor Gary Nicholson said Steven Hayes tormented his victims for seven hours. A New Haven Superior Court jury is considering if Hayes should get the death penalty or life in prison.

Defense attorney Patrick Culligan urged jurors to look at the case unemotionally. He emphasized a psychiatrist's testimony that

Hayes was in an extreme emotional state triggered by co-defendant, Joshua Komisarjevsky who awaits trial.

Hayes was convicted last month of murdering Jennifer Hawke-Petit and her two daughters in a horrific home invasion in
Cheshire in 2007.

His attorneys filed a list of mitigating factors in New Haven Superior Court on Wednesday. The same jury that convicted Hayes
must now weigh those factors against aggravating factors cited by prosecutors, including the heinous and cruel nature of the deaths, in deciding whether to sentence Hayes to death or life in prison.

The defense said Hayes fears life more than death and cited his abusive childhood and history of drug addiction. Deliberations are
tentatively expected to begin Friday following closing arguments on Thursday.

Defense lawyers have depicted Hayes as a follower, while asserting that his co-defendant, Joshua Komisarjevsky, was the
mastermind who escalated the violence.

``Steven Hayes has responded subsequent to the crime with shame, humiliation, depression, suicidality and empathy for the victims.

His response is sharp in contrast to the co-defendant's, who has glorified in writing the exercise of violent criminal power and
sexual abuse over the Petit family,'' defense attorney Tom Ullmann wrote in the court documents filed Wednesday.

Prosecutors say both men are equally responsible. Komisarjevsky will be tried next year.

The defense also noted that Hayes accepted responsibility for his crimes early on and offered to plead guilty before the trial in
exchange for a life sentence.

``Steven Hayes has a conscience and is remorseful,'' Ullmann wrote.

Hayes' attorneys also say his prison conditions in which he is kept isolated 24 hours per day and his guilty feelings ``make his
life nearly unbearable and worse than any fear or dread of death.''

Prosecutors called a prison official who testified Tuesday that Hayes indicated he would be fine with a life sentence and that he
told her before the trial he planned to use his apparent suicidal behavior in prison to try to show he was remorseful and influence
his sentence.

Authorities said Hayes and Komisarjevsky broke into the Petit house, beat Hawke-Petit's husband, William, with a baseball bat and
forced her to withdraw money from a bank before Hayes strangled and sexually assaulted her. Their daughters, Michaela and Hayley, died of smoke inhalation after they were tied to their beds with pillowcases over their heads and doused with gasoline before the house was set ablaze, according to testimony.

Superior Court Judge Jon Blue on Wednesday rejected defense attorneys' objection to using an alternate juror to help decide
punishment. Last week, Blue dismissed one juror who was overheard making a derogatory comment about the defense and replaced that juror with an alternate.

Ullmann said the law calls for the jury that determined Hayes' guilt to decide his sentence. He says the alternate was not a
member of the group that determined Hayes' guilt.

The judge acknowledged Wednesday that the issue is ``very tricky'' and that the law is not clear, and said lawyers could
renew their request after the verdict. He also noted it was the defense who wanted the regular juror dismissed and said the case
could proceed without the alternate and only 11 jurors if both sides agreed.

Ullmann also objected to Blue's plan to have the jury deliberate into Friday evening and the weekend if necessary.

``I think it's a mistake to kind of imply to the jury that it's under pressure to make a decision,'' Ullmann said. ``It starts to
suggest to them we need to get this verdict in as quick as possible.''

Blue said it's his practice in all such cases and that he wants to avoid jury contamination. He said jurors are more likely to face
pressure outside of court and he said the schedule does not pressure the jury on which way they should rule.

There is only one alternate juror left.

Get the latest headlines sent to your inbox!
View Comments (
)
|
Email
|
Print
Leave Comments
What's New
21st Century Solutions
The NBCUniversal Foundation is partnering... Read more
Follow Us
Sign up to receive news and updates that matter to you.
Send Us Your Story Tips
Check Out