High Court Turns Down NYC Case Against Gun Industry

Updated 3:15 PM EST, Mon, Mar 9, 2009

TWITTER FACEBOOK

)

The Supreme Court will not hear a case that would hold firearms companies responsible for selling guns that end up in illegal markets.
Getty Images

The Supreme Court has turned away pleas by New York City and gun violence victims to hold the firearms industry responsible for selling guns that could end up in illegal markets.

     The justices' decision Monday ends lawsuits first filed in 2000.
 
Federal appeals courts in New York and Washington threw out the complaints after Congress passed a law in 2005 giving the gun industry broad immunity against such lawsuits.
    
Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the city was examining whether it had other legal options. "It was one tool. It was one part of our strategy to fight against illegal guns," he said.
    
The city's lawsuit asked for no monetary damages. It had sought a court order for gun makers to more closely monitor those dealers who frequently sell guns later used to commit crimes.
    
But the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal law provides the gun industry with broad immunity from lawsuits brought by crime victims and violence-plagued cities. The Supreme Court refused to reconsider that decision.
    
The lawsuit was first brought in June 2000 while Rudy Giuliani was New York mayor. It was delayed due to the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and because of similar litigation in the state courts.
    
The city refiled the lawsuit in January 2004, saying manufacturers let handguns reach illegal markets at gun shows in which non-licensed people can sell to other private citizens; through private sales in which background checks are not required; by oversupplying markets where gun regulations are lax, and by having poor overall security.
    
The city said a state nuisance law makes it a crime to knowingly or recklessly create a condition endangering the safety or health of a considerable number of people. But the appeals court said New York's law does not qualify as an exception to federal law. It agreed with U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, signed by President George W. Bush in 2005, is constitutional.
    
The cases are City of New York v. Beretta, 08-530, and Lawson v. Beretta, 08-545.

First Published: Mar 9, 2009 2:02 PM EST

TWITTER FACEBOOK

  • 0% furious 0
  • 0% sad 0
  • 0% bored 0
  • 0% thrilled 0
  • 0% intrigued 0
  • 0% laughing 0
processing
          No comments have been posted yet.

          You have 2000 characters left

          processing
          So My City

          You are posting in (change)

          550/550 characters

          (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)

          (jpg, pngs, or gifs allowed)
          *Tip: You can also post moments via email or Twitter.

          processing

          View Your Moment in

          Posted by | 1 second ago

          Don't Miss

          local_beat

          Nov 20, 2009

          "Obama Fried Chicken" Sign Cut From Rap Video

          MTV airs music video with the words "Obama Fried Chicken" removed from the Brooklyn restaurant's awning.

          Read It

          politics

          Nov 20, 2009

          Obama in Asia: Style Over Substance

          President Barack Obama returns from his maiden Asian swing with none of the concrete accomplishments that White Houses typically put in place before big trips.

          Read It

          local_beat

          Nov 20, 2009

          Jude Law Attacks NYU Students With Produce

          The hunky actor made a fruitless attempt to fend off nosy NYU students by launching oranges at the pesky co-eds who were gazing at the actor on his terrace from their high-rise dorm rooms.

          Read It
          Loading...
          Birthdate:
          You must be at least 13 to sign up.
          Gender:
          invalid

          By clicking the button below, I accept the terms of use and privacy policy

          Already Signed Up? Login Below.

          processing
          Here's what we're posting:

          *Only used for verification. We do not store your password.
          processing